Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world.
Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
As long as the more similar quality of economy in some countries, the ability of purchasing is increasing. This makes most citizens are capable of buying the similar products from every corner of the world. Based on economic analysis, this issue will produce both positive and negative impacts of country’s development.
It is accepted that the increase of purchasing power causes some positive impacts. Along with the development of internet, people will get equal access to shop particular products over the world. This makes inhabitants easier when they need something that originated from overseas. After purchasing those products, citizens will adapt to operate them. The more common products are, the more adaptable citizens when they visit different countries and use the facilities there. The future result is a mutualistic relationship between countries to introduce and bargain their own products.
Although this issue creates the benefits, it is also harmful for the development of countries themselves. The use of imported products will be a massive issue related to the degeneration of local products. In addition, the manufacturers of local goods will obtain less income as the imported products are more interested. This will affect the circumstance of local companies towards the collapse. Moreover, some products from overseas which are known as the very rare ones will be affected. When those products are originally prestigious, the prestige will decrease as longs as many people can grab it easily.
All in all, even though inhabitants manage to purchase the same products from overseas will encourage the development of their countries, it will be the negatives, too. But, when people can balance to purchase both local and international products, these negative impacts will be diminished
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.48042704626 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85821624157 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.537366548043 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 22.2709020829 49.4020404114 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.5882352941 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5294117647 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.35294117647 7.06120827912 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245080386156 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799704472844 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539271595596 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165587715684 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0669442989204 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.