As countries become more developed, many fast food outlets move into the country giving local people greater access to fast food. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
It is a matter of fact that the fast-food industry is becoming more and more essential for the development of any country recently. As a result, people get access to this type of food easier, which brings about not only benefits but also potential risks.
One the one hand, undeniably, the more fast food outlets appear, the more advantages people receive. Firstly, this field has an enormous demand for the workforce while entering a new market. Consequently, this action offers opportunities for people who are in need of jobs. Secondly, living in these modern and tiring days, many find it time-saving when eating fast food than cooking at home. According to the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, about 85 million people consume this food in just only a single day.
On the other hand, a preference for this convenient food can spark off extreme negativeness. People frequently having fast food are likely to experience dangerous diseases. The percentage of having heart attacks, diabetes, cancer is considerably high because this food contains a huge amount of sugar, cholesterol and salt component. Besides, the love for processed food can lead to the neglect of nation diverse specialties. The community would pay less attention to either distinct or delicious food of their country. Consequently, these cannot be promoted reasonably and widely.
In conclusion, the fact that fast food is the cause of tremendous health problems and ignorance of nation special food certainly outweigh the benefits, which are the convenience and the workforce needs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 325, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun find seems to be countable; consider using: 'many finds'.
Suggestion: many finds
...living in these modern and tiring days, many find it time-saving when eating fast food th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, firstly, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 41.998997996 57% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 251.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2828685259 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79953556976 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633466135458 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.7400621266 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.7142857143 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9285714286 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380923781316 0.244688304435 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.11965303316 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869577602661 0.0667982634062 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231611456672 0.151304729494 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0662088322043 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.