Undoubtedly, junk food has embeded in our everyday lives more than ever, since individuals have easier access to this food rather than healthy meals. Despite the equality that such an accessibility brings about, consisting its main advantage, the drawbacks related to people's health and type of lifestyle far superpass the upsides.
The only benefit that greater availability of fast food may have is that it aims to an equal distribution of goods in the modern society. Indeed, street food cost less than a well-prepared meal, making poorer families prefer the cheapest choice. This accessibility often is an outcome of the failure of societies to take care of the nutrition of impoverished households, pushing them in the purchase of burgers or fish and chips. KFC, for instance, offers an inevitably cheaper meal than a restaurant in the centre of the metropolitan areas, and thus it ends up with increased sales each year. If governments offered to everyone equal access to nutritional meals by putting an umbrella in prices of these products, people would not prefer fast food.
This consumption, however, has far more disadvantages concerning the diseases related to junk food and the individual's dietary lifestyle. It is true that diseases like obesity and cancer are connected with the consumption of this food. Nutrient deficient meals like McDonalds, for example, are the main reason of high rates of obesity in USA over the last decade. Despite this, people prefer these meals rather than vegetables or fruits, changing their whole habits because of their sedentary lives. Clearly, the lifestyle that we choose impacts our health, and the lives we run affect our feeding.
In conclusion, in terms of cost, greater access to fast food leads to an equal diffusion of goods among the members of a society. When it comes to health and lifestyle, though, this access has negative impacts. The disadvantages, therefore, far outweigh the advantages, in my view.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...ain advantage, the drawbacks related to peoples health and type of lifestyle far superp...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put after the verb 'is'.
Suggestion: is often
...the cheapest choice. This accessibility often is an outcome of the failure of societies ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my view, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2106918239 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80693627684 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584905660377 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0249737152 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.466666667 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.225117472792 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0765935347158 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591924002976 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143916174996 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0240881859895 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.