Countries should try to produce all the food for the population and import as little food as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It has been a major concern for nations to ensure adequate food for its entire people throughout the centuries. Some people contend that government should focus on producing all kinds of foods while importing as less as possible. I firmly believe that producing many kinds of foods is an inevitable effort in terms of ensuring nation’s food security.
On the one hand, self-producing yields significant benefits for domestic economy, both farmers and customers. Firstly, shopping locally supports local farmers and sustainable farming. By selling directly to the public at farmers’ markets can merchants ensure that they can gain a significant share based on their crops and livestock, instead of being forced off the land because of living in deprivations. This encourages peasants to cultivate and rear a wide assortment of crops and animals. Therefore, the locals can gain an enormous choice of fresh produces, but at chargeable cost. Additionally, purchasers can partly fortify their health conditions. For example, the groceries from the seller whose produces are additive-free but also in a connection with the rhythm of the seasons help the locals avoid being diagnosed with chronic diseases.
On the other hand, I would argue that growing all kind of food and conducting import restrictions are inappropriate. Firstly, it is unattainable to produce all food within a certain country. Weather is instrumental in output of crops. Not many countries have the right weathers to grow certain fruits. For example, sweet mangoes can mostly be found only in tropical countries whereas in cold weather countries, they will be less tasty. Moreover, the international commodities market, which to some extent enhances the living standards of the citizens, increases significant demand of the locals, and more and more people prefer foreign food. Therefore, that every country imports the food they lack is undeniable.
In conclusion, I again reaffirm that the liberty and thrive of a nation is unable to be attained if lack of appropriate legislation of allocating food source.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 218, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
... kinds of foods while importing as less as possible. I firmly believe that produci...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1764.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41104294479 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97190350968 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622699386503 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1697119784 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1111111111 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260746616017 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802158383542 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0808014916497 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155254447246 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10652128549 0.056905535591 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.8 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.71 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.