creative artist should always freedom about what they want to do.there shold be no government restriction over them what they want to do.to what extend do you agree or not.
Innovative creators should always have liberation to demonstrates their personal intentions in desirable way they want. There would be no legislation or government limitation on what they work. An art needs liberty to create a master piece but with restrictions imaginative process halts. In this essay we will discuss some unethical demonstration of art which against the specific culture, besides the expression of freedom for progressive imaginative art could not be achieved.
In some countries put particular constraint over artists because some of them creating such thing which contradict the culture and tradition of country. Undoubtedly, Art is representative of its inhabitants and culture. For example in Muslims national Television and film industry regularized by administration of country to avoid culture and customs which is not part of their religion. Although, scenes including drinking and vulgarity banned by authority.
On the other side Art could be learn and become master in its application, but apart from that freedom and peace is most important for creating something different from rest. Therefore; without peace of mind and freedom of work most of the artist cannot work under such condition. For instance with increased demand of calligraphy in other countries government of Pakistan ordered their artist to create more art for export. Because of commercialization many producer of art creating art which could not said innovative.
In conclusion,this essay discussed the both side of view about creativity of artist is either under government control or having absolute freedom about their work. Although, I absolutely agree this point of view that art is not limited to specific country or region, art is universally appreciated and acclaim. However, in this liberation if the art which make world-famous art than it would also increased the popularity and nobility of country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 175, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...creating something different from rest. Therefore; without peace of mind and freedom of w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...ncreased demand of calligraphy in other countries government of Pakistan ordered their ar...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 425, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...r artist to create more art for export. Because of commercialization many producer of a...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 454, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun producer seems to be countable; consider using: 'many producers'.
Suggestion: many producers
...or export. Because of commercialization many producer of art creating art which could not sai...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , this
...uld not said innovative. In conclusion,this essay discussed the both side of view a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, so, therefore, apart from, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1619.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50680272109 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07361250055 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574829931973 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0860020411 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.933333333 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132397975225 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0494312228637 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686973690656 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0828497324997 0.151304729494 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612882546559 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.