Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road cause some problems. What are the problems? What are the solutions?
Cyclists and car drivers sharing the same road can indeed give rise to certain challenges. These issues are not insurmountable, as effective measures can be implemented to mitigate them. This essay aims to explore the various problems that arise from this coexistence and suggest viable solutions to address the concerns.
It is undeniable that when bicycles and motor vehicles share the same lane, several issues are bound to arise. Firstly, a significant concern is the heightened risk of accidents involving these disparate modes of transportation. The mortality rate for cyclists and motorbike riders on shared roads tends to be notably higher compared to situations where dedicated lanes are available. Given the significant size and speed disparity between bicycles and cars or motorbikes, blind spots are a major concern. The reduced visibility of cyclists to larger, faster vehicles can lead to tragic accidents. Secondly, encountering cyclists traveling in the opposite direction poses another challenge. In such scenarios, larger vehicles might not have sufficient time to brake adequately, resulting in collisions that could otherwise be avoided.
To address these concerns, a multifaceted approach must be adopted. Firstly, if it is unavoidable for bicycles and vehicles to share the same lane, speed limits should be rigorously enforced, with stringent penalties for violators. The imposition of speed restrictions would create a safer environment for all road users, minimizing the risk of accidents. Additionally, if road width permits, the ideal solution would involve separate lanes for distinct types of vehicles. Government authorities should prioritize road planning and design that accommodates the unique needs of both cyclists and motor vehicle operators.
In conclusion, the coexistence of cyclists and car drivers on the same roads presents tangible challenges that require immediate attention. The prevalence of accidents and collisions underscores the urgency of implementing effective solutions. By enforcing speed limits and promoting road design that allocates distinct lanes for different types of vehicles, these issues can be effectively tackled. Striving for harmonious road-sharing between cyclists and motor vehicle drivers is crucial for the safety and well-being of all road users.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1987.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80994152047 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01345120029 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576023391813 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.9421901527 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.578947368 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21052631579 7.06120827912 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217017640723 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669547710331 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071271791338 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148672774763 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521021962994 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.12 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1987.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80994152047 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01345120029 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576023391813 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.9421901527 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.578947368 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.21052631579 7.06120827912 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217017640723 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0669547710331 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.071271791338 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148672774763 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0521021962994 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.12 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.25 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.