It is a fact that children in the countryside in underdeveloped nations have fewer opportunities to approach education. While some people suppose that building schools and recruiting more teachers can help to improve this issue, I have a thought that this can be handled by providing more computers and internet access.
First and foremost, computers and internet access are both vital in education. It is undeniable that thanks to the computer, students can study more conveniently and effectively. They can use the computer to solve homework, look for more information about several domains; as a result, students can have a deeper understanding of numerous diverse subjects.
However, I think that the Government should provide a lot of schools and teachers for children in rural communities. Firstly, school is a place where students acquire more chances to exchange knowledge with each other; and, it aids children to improve their communication and vocabularies and develop their ideas when they work in a group. Besides, teachers may teach not only academic knowledge about different subjects but also behaviors in society. Moreover, teachers can know the strengths or weaknesses of the student in the teaching process. Therefore, students may be in to follow a field of study match, which is something the Internet does not do.
In conclusion, there are conflicting views about helping children access education in economically developing nations. From my point of view, I believe in providing a lot of schools and teachers is better than giving computers and the Internet.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, while, i think, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.364 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97861444299 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.592 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 408.6 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.4763823266 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.75 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5833333333 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.383281964768 0.244688304435 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118734875775 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0874835914628 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220547889723 0.151304729494 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637963990632 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.