With the development of the medica online, there is no future for the radio. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
With the rapid developments of technology and social media, no more people use radio broadcasting in their daily habits, as a result, radio has been on the verge of extinction. I believe that radio plays a vital role in our society although people no longer use it.
On the one hand, there are various reasons explained why humans ignore using radio broadcasting these days. The first reason relates to the limitations of radio nowadays. Viewers find it hard to gather information via radio because radio only publishes at a fixed time frame. In contrast, watching videos or listening to music on some websites such as Youtube or Spotify without limitations is more convenient if they access the Internet. Furthermore, due to the eye-catching images and realistic sounds being more interesting than radio, people have got into image-and-screen-obsessed. As a result, audio and print media will cease to exist unless they adapt.
I still believe that radios bring various meanings and vital roles in our lives. First and foremost, the radio is suitable for several situations; for instance, you can turn on the radio to enjoy music while driving the car. As a result, you can focus on driving without the distraction of screens causing accidents and remain the commuter's favorite activity for the decade to come. Nevertheless, radio demonstrates the evolution and development of technology, also the achievement of so preserving radio is essential. Although people think radio cannot convey messages with images and motions as television and the Internet do, the advent of other technologies has also reinforced the popularity of radio.
In conclusion, although people no longer use the radio much, it is still a part of our lives. It is predicted that people will try to preserve radio as a means of communication and media.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, still, while, for instance, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1530.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13422818792 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04006844091 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58389261745 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 486.0 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5726443077 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.0 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.26666666667 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216434701905 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748109159042 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518403699322 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138151106071 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0631179076516 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.