The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast food in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast food.
The bar chart illustrates how much money British people spent on buying fast food. The line graph gives information about the amount of fast food consumption in Britain.
In general, high-paid people consumed more fast food than the low income. Fish and chips were the most common food, while pizza had a downward trend.
The high-income people spend ten more than average-paid people and triple as much as the low income. High-paid and low-paid had the same patterns in the amount of money on fish and chips consumption, at 18 compared to 25 of the average-income people. The expenditure spent on pizza for three typical people was 20, 11, and 6, respectively.
From 1970 and 1980, pizza was the highest number, at 300 grams. 50 grams of fish and chips consumption is more than the hamburger. Fish and chips and hamburgers increased dramatically, while hamburgers significantly decreases. During the half of the period, the money spent on fish and chips went up and outlooked pizza spending. Pizza continually decreased and made up 200 grams in total, compared with 300 grams of hamburger.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 914.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02197802198 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78527534093 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549450549451 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.7957692123 43.030603864 51% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 76.1666666667 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1666666667 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.25 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212439411472 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0900829951332 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114013100751 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175690614541 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.166277293661 0.0819641961636 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.2329268293 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.24 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.