The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.

The given line graph and bar one illustrates the fluctuation in the utilisation of people in UK on fast foods, in termsof money and weight Overall, one can see that there is a huge difference in the figures of 3 kind of people in the bar chart as well as the number in the line graph

The people with high income spend more than 40 pence per week per person on Hamburger, which is the largest in comparison with remaining ones. Whereas, with approximately 25, which is 10 pence more than the others, the people with average salaries ranks first in consuming fish and chips. And, the money for buying pizza also has a huge difference: The highest number belongs to the high income, with about 2 times and 4 times more than the average and the lower ones, respectively.

In terms of the number of pizza, it increased steadily in a 15-year period from the 70s to the 1985, and at that period the number peaked at about 110 grams per person, then it went up sharply for the next 10 years, making about 500g.it ranked second finally, just nearly 100 grams more than the 3rd: pizza, which showed a downside trend from 1970 til 15 years later, and then rose minimally to more than 200 grams. The figure of fish anh chips went up dramatically within 2 decades, reached the highest point of 500g

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kind' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kinds'.
Suggestion: kinds
...s a huge difference in the figures of 3 kind of people in the bar chart as well as t...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, if, second, so, then, well, whereas, kind of, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.48728813559 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30353808405 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567796610169 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 311.4 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 47.0 22.4926829268 209% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 138.219535522 43.030603864 321% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 211.8 112.824112599 188% => OK
Words per sentence: 47.2 22.9334400587 206% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 15.6 5.23603664747 298% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0881962225655 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.038519222494 0.103423049105 37% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039282875358 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0598645361707 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0219725674854 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.3 13.2329268293 176% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.1 10.3012195122 176% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.65 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.5 11.4329268293 241% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 20.8 10.9970731707 189% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.