The given combination of a bar chart and line graph illustrates the information regarding expenditure of money on fast food every weekend Britain and depicts the trend in consumption of fast food namely hamburgers, pizza, fish and chips from 1970 to 1990.
As is observed in the bar chart, hamburger is the most favourite food item among people with high income that is more than one-fourth and average with just between 35% and 30% while low income persons mostly prefer fish and chips with about a little less than 20%. Moreover, a quarter of individuals in the section of the average income and approximately 17% people in high income category like to spend money for fish and chips. About 15% of people in the last category consumed hamburger. Approximately 20%, 12% and 8% like pizza in the section of high income, average income and low income respectively.
Moving forward to line graph, consumption of fish and chipps was highest in 1917 with about 300 grams which decreased gradually to 200 grams only until 1985. The hamburgers and pizza were very less popular in 1970 with consumption of less than 100 grams however this showed an inclining trend until the last year with about 300 grams of pizza and more than 500 grams of hamburger in 1990. About 230 grams of fish and chip were consumed.
Overall, it is clear that everyone I have unique choice according to their preference and the level of their income, and also in the starting years people mostly consumed fish and chips but at the end this preference altered to hamburgers.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 6.8 265% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1280.0 965.302439024 133% => OK
No of words: 266.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81203007519 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50128577937 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515037593985 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 382.5 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.0889015367 43.030603864 181% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.222222222 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5555555556 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115813051244 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478480558474 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813186644651 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0885898096412 0.15604864568 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106965144192 0.0819641961636 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.