In this technical era, everyone especially younger are using mobile phones and these are used mostly for social networks. Several studies had shown that in the current phase, children between 13 and 18 years are using social sites in order to do online meetings with each other rather than personal gatherings. Development and improvement of technology is the major reason behind this. This essay shall not only explain the causes but also the steps to be taken to increase the meetings in personal.
Commencing with, socialising online is convenient and time saving as it provides various people according to our preferences by just clicking on our phone. In other words , everyone relates technology with personal comfort, so young generation do not want to struggle or do hardworking for searching for a friend which further leads to meet people online rather than personal meetings. Moreover, teenagers have more choices on social network to choose from. For example, Instagram, Facebook and Snapchat allow young people to find their relations from numerous options which is easier and time-saving. Hence, teenagers like to meet people online rather than connecting bodily.
In addition many measures can be taken to encourage the youth to meet and get to know each other in actual and not over social network, such as to create more offline meeting sites where teenagers can conduct their gatherings. To elaborate it, more the gathering spots, lesser the socialising online. For instance, if hotels or restaurants would provide a better and cheaper place for youngsters to meet and match each other's' hobbies, behavior, etcetera. Thus, arranging more spots to gather can motivate younger people to meet in person as compared on social network.
In conclusion, I do believe that teenagers found the social sites an easier and best way to make new relations in comparison to offline. Creating new places to get together can help in reducing problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 171, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...st clicking on our phone. In other words , everyone relates technology with person...
^^
Line 3, column 5, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: addition,
...ne rather than connecting bodily. In addition many measures can be taken to encourage...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1641.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20952380952 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60726271387 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609523809524 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6681012463 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.4 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258067175208 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0820264640429 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492078491352 0.0667982634062 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142352476259 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565759493054 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.