In this technical era, everyone especially young people are using the mobiles for various purposes. A part of society considers that teenagers should be stopped from using their phones during the days of school while other part regards that youngsters should be free to use their cellphones. I do believe that access of children over the mobile phones should be limited which is mentioned in this essay along with two distinct thoughts in upcoming paragraphs.
Commencing with, a plethora of youngsters may come in contact with the content which is irrelevant to their age and is not suitable for them. To elaborate it, there are numerous sites which are only for adults and not for children below 18 years. For example, on the Internet there are a lot of sites showing sexual content, way to do cyber criming, hacking and many more. Moreover, using mobile can sometimes lead to health issues along with mental problems which can create a lot of problems for the teenagers as well as their parents. Hence, a number of people suggest that the people that phones should be banned for children in school days.
On the other hand, mobile phones are beneficial for a child as it help the students in getting the academy resources helpful in their studies. In other words phone is accessible in educational purposes as it contain the answers of every question. For instance, Wikipedia is an application which plays an important role same as an encyclopaedia or dictionary, because one can find everything on it with just a click. Furthermore, mobiles have maps which can assist the children whenever they lost their way. Thus, people consider that younger should have free access over phones due to its advantage regarding helpful in academic purposes and safety.
In conclusion, I strongly think that children should have limited access over the use of mobile because mobiles have both advantages and disadvantages.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, may, moreover, regarding, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1596.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01886792453 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59050030378 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537735849057 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0818611018 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.0 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1428571429 7.06120827912 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.336366997777 0.244688304435 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119054169466 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0984247886191 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210438571241 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102042706712 0.056905535591 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.