Success and failure have a strong interconnection which indicates that a person is unable to be successful until he became familiar with failure. There are numerous people who wanted to pursue a career in sports but they pull their feet backward because of the phobia of getting failed and pressure from guardians. I strongly believe that the support provided by the parents would be greatly beneficial for a child who wanted to be a professional athlete.
Commencing with, a teenage is totally dependent on parent's choice in every section of life. In other words, parents are responsible for the alternative on which their child rely on. As starting from the very beginning of young one's life his mother and father make choice for him on which child's life depends. So, if parent's choice is right regarding child's preference, it would greatly affect youngster's performance whether in business or sports. For instance, Messi is a well-known professional football player and in his success his parent's correct choice played an important role, as if his parents would not choose him for making his career in football, he will not be at the position, he is now on. Hence, parential decision affect youngster's career.
In addition, some masses consider failing as a sin which leads them to give up on their dreams of becoming professional athletes. Encouragement can work as a remedy in demolishing this type of fear. To elaborate it, parents play a significant role in supporting the young one's in the times of losing a game or sport which will motivate them to move on and win. For example, a famous cricketer Sachin Tendulkar explained that he would not be successful if his mother and father did not encourage him after losing any match. Thus, motivation provided by any guardian can make a great difference between victory and defeat.
In conclusion, I do think that parents support in the form of the decision-making and providing motivation can help children to become professional sportsman.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, regarding, so, thus, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1668.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02409638554 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8485887438 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569277108434 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1278851949 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.2 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46666666667 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0639283899268 0.244688304435 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0199864230539 0.084324248473 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0317403221209 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0432757488976 0.151304729494 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0293298247013 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.