Nowadays The world consumes the same information that is taken from the same media. I completely believe that this situation can bring more advantages than drawbacks.
It is true that the consumption of the same media will affect not only the habits of the people but also the country’s tradition will be vague. People around the world were drawn into internet surfing with social media as most people use. Then, something that is popular in the world will be followed by people. For instance, we know that we use YouTube channel to produce some Vlog, this media is popular in the last decade and many public around the world be the vlogger to gain money on it. One person who succeeded in it will inspire others to do the same thing. Therefore, the way that people do the same thing will affect the substitution of tradition, culture, and behavior.
On the other hand, there are some advantages to introducing similar media around the world. Firstly, people can gain knowledge that is more accessible than before from the developing countries. The developed countries can be an image for developing countries as the information was shared into the same media such as Facebook, YouTube, Instagram. For illustration, Japan is a well-known country that has a discipline on-time schedule and hard worker. Then the tradition is published on YouTube and many people around the world can imitate those traditions to be implemented in their country. Others example, people will be exposed to the information with English as International Language, and we love the same food as internationals do such as KFC, MCD, Starbuck.
In conclusion, although the difference among countries will be diminished due to the consumption of the same media, the countries can be more take benefits because they can grow together with no countries left behind.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, then, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05901639344 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7388806742 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.531147540984 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8041534849 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.866666667 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.33333333333 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183713632532 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697809307648 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0284908766007 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123559833116 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0238950115766 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.