Different types of robots are being invented which are good friends to humankind and can help them with work and at home.
Is this a positive or negative development? (Vietnam,2021.04.24)
Since the recent advancements in the technological domain, robots have been gaining in popularity at home and work alike. In my opinion, although the widespread use of robotics technology is not without its drawbacks, it appears that, in general, this is a positive development.
Critics of robots helping humans often point out the accompanying rising unemployment rate and over-reliance on technology. Since robots are capable of functioning with absolute precision and without fatigue at work, they are deemed to become substitutes to humans in many sectors, particularly in manufacturing processes, making a colossal number of factory workers redundant. Furthermore, humans may become over-depend on robots when they become acclimated to robots being at their disposal. If their computerized machines malfunction or break down, they may have trouble having finish work.
Nevertheless, putting robotics technology into practice is a change for the better due to the productivity and safety that it brings. At many workplaces, robots with their capabilities to execute repeated manual tasks rapidly have freed many from humdrum tasks. This not only helps boost productivity but also allows employees to devote valuable time to tasks that require creativity and innovation. Robots can also be a replacement for humans in hazardous working environments. For example, a growing number of unmanned spacecraft nowadays complete space exploration missions, lowering the risks of fatal accidents for astronauts. At home, robots equipped with artificial intelligence can take on the role of a caretaker as well as a companion to citizens, especially the elderly. Not only can robots help senior citizens with household chores but they also are used to mitigate loneliness and dementia since these robots are able to hold basic conversations and even displaying human-like emotions.
In conclusion, the fact that robots are now universal both at home and work may make some worry about redundancy and heavy reliance on technology. However, the increased productivity and safety that advanced robotics brings make it an acceptable development. Government and corporations should invest more in this technology.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, well, for example, in conclusion, in general, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1882.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6686746988 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11413738418 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614457831325 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0818699701 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.625 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.1875 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227035907089 0.244688304435 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770327442553 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435802189153 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138236757922 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285515311022 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.