Recently robotic research has been prevalent all over the world, grabbing much attention of scientists who are adept in this field. A wide range of robots is now designed to aid people in their work and on the daily basis. Despite the many disadvantages that may derive from this arrangement, it is felt that robotic development is predominantly advantageous to human beings. This will be proven by looking at how they can be friends with humans and can help them at work and home.
For one, robots can pretend partly human in some communication activities. Consequently, humans, especially the elderly, can benefit from that. For example, after retiring, the older persons feel somehow lonely when their children work all day long and do not spend time communicating with them at all. These robots are designed to make them feel happier and play as intimate friends of them. Talking and sharing are demonstrated as ways to escape loneliness, thereby enhancing the mental health of human beings and diminishing the prospect of suffering mental disorders such as depression, etc…Thus, owning a robot at home is advantageous for people who are likely to feel lonely.
In addition to this, robots also contribute to reducing the workload in workplaces or at home as well. For example, a robot designed by Japanese engineers could travel around the house to do a wide range of odd jobs, lightening the burden on housewives. Moreover, robots are effective tools for labor-intensive works, curb the time needed for producing due to the high productivity and automation they possess. As this story illustrates, the advantages of robotic development are numerous.
To conclude, despite the disadvantage of the fact that robots will replace a certain number of people in the job market, rendering them unemployed, the existence of many robots has many more merits than drawbacks. It is thus hoped that robots can accompany people in some other challenging tasks in the foreseen future.
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 595, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thus
...ental disorders such as depression, etc…Thus, owning a robot at home is advantageous...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, look, may, moreover, so, thus, well, for example, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14241486068 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89203529506 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582043343653 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6338635025 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.733333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5333333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272212631718 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096827415537 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842249737716 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168588233254 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809609233202 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 595, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Thus
...ental disorders such as depression, etc…Thus, owning a robot at home is advantageous...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, look, may, moreover, so, thus, well, for example, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1661.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14241486068 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89203529506 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582043343653 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6338635025 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.733333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5333333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272212631718 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.096827415537 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842249737716 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168588233254 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809609233202 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.