In recent years digicom applications such as electronic mail, the number of messaging software like Whatsapp, Facebook messenger et cetera and Facebook which is the social network has developed enormously. These applications build implications among people for making interaction but it doesn't devote connection with people. I partially agree that digital mechanisms evolved only for simplifying the conversation among people, it doesn't endow the robust relationship between people. This essay will denote the repercussion of digital connectivity as well as does it create a robust connection with people.
On the first hand, Advances in communication application is becoming widespread all over the world. This gives abundant features and communicates effectively with others without putting a lot of effort. Because everything is happening through the air which is technically named as a network. To exemplify, 10 years before most of the people had communication through the postal service. The technology has evolved and improved connectivity mechanism to the next level. According to the report which is unveiled by the popular news stated that 97.3% of people have been using communication software like Whatsapp, an immediate message delivery application.
On the flip side, although it has plenty of features to make people communicate effectively, it does not endow the strong relationship among people. Why I stating this information here?. Olden days many people meet others while playing, visiting the festival and attending marriage functions. But now most of the people chatting with others through the applications with one hand mobiles. As a result, people failed to make a robust relationship like before. In addition to that, many of us do not know who are close relatives and neighbors.
To recapitulate what I described briefly about how social network and messengers have been evolved and devoid of connection among people, digicom do people communicate with each other but it will not create the platform to build the relationship in the society.
- You have just spent a week with a friend on holiday. When you got home, you realised you had left your wallet there.. thank your friend for the holiday.. explain that you left your wallet in their house.. give them instructions of how to send it back to y73
- You have a problem with a neighbour Write a letter to your neighbor i your letter Describe the problem say how long it has been a problem Explain what action you want the neighbors to take73
- A large company in your area has decided to spend a certain amount of money, either to sponsor a local children’s sports team for two years, or to pay for two open-air concerts. It has asked for feedback from the general public.Write a letter to the com56
- The costs of international travel are decreasing and tourism is growing. What are the advantages and disadvantages of increasing tourism activity in different countries?73
- A large company in your area has decided to spend a certain amount of money, either to sponsor a local children’s sports team for two years, or to pay for open-air concerts. It has asked for feedback from the general public.Write a letter to the company73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 288, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
...ng people for making interaction but it doesnt devote connection with people. I partia...
Line 1, column 431, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
...fying the conversation among people, it doesnt endow the robust relationship between p...
Line 1, column 607, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
...create a robust connection with people. On the first hand, Advances in communica...
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: I_AM
Message: Did you mean 'I am'?
Suggestion: I am
...e strong relationship among people. Why I stating this information here?. Olden d...
Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, but, first, if, so, well, while, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53459119497 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01020113379 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8998173598 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.529411765 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7058823529 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11764705882 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235892432232 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0708867976735 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0544719083197 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14470014783 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0534512774503 0.056905535591 94% => OK
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.