It is common that the highest management of businesses is covered by senior and experienced leaders. However, some people believe in the fact, that young generation should take over. I'm partially agree with this statement. This essay will discuss this interesting topic and provide evidence and examples.
Firstly, business' success is depended on its leaders, who manage lower ranked managers, staff and labours. The Leadership is something individuals are born with or can be taught at universities. Many organisations are critically reliant on experienced staff who provides the best model role to others. In particular banks, businesses focused on human resources cannot be supervised by young staff. This named professions require highly qualified, trained and experienced individuals. Th experience is something people learn over the years, as a result of this, young people are not suitable to be in leading position.
From the other hand, many companies such as Apple, Google, Facebook etc. are seeking young experts with fresh and innovative ideas to boost their profit. Notwithstanding, senior and experienced managers are essential in matter of financial control, their ideas might be out of date. Young generation accommodated easily to new technology and software than their elder society, based on this fact, their performance in leadership will be highly appreciated. The named global companies are the clear example of business empowered by unexperienced, however, graduated individuals.
To sum up, so called older people in managers position might benefit any business, nevertheless, young leaders should be more innovative and experienced from their lifestyle.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...that young generation should take over. Im partially agree with this statement. Th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, so, as to, in particular, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 252.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69841269841 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0074443623 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.630952380952 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.4338133235 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.75 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.75 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141294052411 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451341128684 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473632698977 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0958452694569 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353390292671 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.33 50.2224549098 78% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.48 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.21 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.