Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped and taught separately.

Essay topics:

Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped and taught separately.

In our school education system there are several factors which can affect students’ behavior and knowledge. One of the solutions to overcome such problems is putting all bad habited students together and teaching them separately. As a result disobedient students also intend to study without hesitation among others with the same behavior. Another effect of separating is other silent and clever students can get proper knowledge without interruption. However, there may occur an issue in the group with bad behavioral pupils if clever and knowledgeable students also give up studies joining to their peers who do not want to learn.

In my point of view, it would be effective to group all noisy student of one class into one group not considering their knowledge. Coming from my own experience this method may possibly work in schools as not intelligent students also try to show off their skills in front of other clever group members in order not to be the last. They overcome their shyness and hesitation to speak because others also have the same character.

Another importance of such grouping is that by this effectiveness of studying would rise. By this I mean if there is not any disturbance in the class during the lesson, students who are willing to get knowledge can acquire subjects easily and quickly.

Admittedly, putting all noisy and clever but noisy students might cause to decrease in skillful pupils’ studying rates. To be more precise, knowledgeable students may fed up answering to the questions of a teacher which are asked only from them while other group members just laugh and joke at each other and this may cause to join to the side of students who regret to study.

To conclude, making group of obedient students and teaching them detachedly from others may give positive results in increasing education system of schools. For this reason, I hope it will soon to be put into practice although there may happen some minor problems inside of bad behavioral students’ groups.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... together and teaching them separately. As a result disobedient students also inte...
^^
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: MIGHT_PERHAPS[1]
Message: Use simply 'may', 'possibly'.
Suggestion: may; possibly
...ming from my own experience this method may possibly work in schools as not intelligent stud...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'may'.
Suggestion: may
...ming from my own experience this method may possibly work in schools as not intelligent stud...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 73, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'decreasing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: decreasing
...d clever but noisy students might cause to decrease in skillful pupils' studying rates...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 330, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'joining'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'cause' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: joining
...d joke at each other and this may cause to join to the side of students who regret to s...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, while, i mean, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0628742515 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71211381259 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538922155689 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1429149329 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.785714286 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.21428571429 7.06120827912 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281270005744 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104701273284 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038671809227 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163563234356 0.151304729494 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427692007129 0.056905535591 75% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.