Do you agree or disagree with the statement that the government should invest more money in science education rather than other subjects to develop the country?
It is argued that government should allocate more money on science rather than any other subject in order to promote the development of a country. While I believe that investment in science teaching is beneficial and even vital, I think that it should not be prioritized over other subjects because each has its own significance and merits.
On the one hand, I agree that spending on science teaching makes enormous contributions to the country’s growth. Firstly, equipping youngsters with more knowledge about science and technology can lead to the inventions of many state-of-the-art devices. Therefore, a nation can become more prosperous and its citizens will lead a more comfortable life. For example, in Vietnam, a high school student created the first agrimotor, thanks to what he had learned in his physics class, saving labour for farmers and boosting agricultural productivity. Secondly, no one can deny the contributions of artificial intelligence, taught in some scientific universities, which creates robots and programs to replace people in risky tasks such as space exploration or natural energy exploitation.
On the other hand, other subjects are also important, so government needs to invest in them too. For example, language teaching is essential to help students learn and use different languages for international communication. Because we are living in a global village, helping students master other languages can contribute to promoting international trade and relations. Furthermore, civic education, albeit not a science subject, can educate young students about their social responsibilities, so that they will grow to be better citizens. As a result, the country can reduce social evils such as crime, which is a fundamental factor to building a healthy society.
In conclusion, despite the importance and obvious benefits of science education, I believe that government should balance their spending across all school subjects.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59531772575 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.191669479 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622073578595 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9539251427 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.692307692 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3076923077 7.06120827912 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279096286932 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.095992023702 0.084324248473 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105447330477 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16740353085 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109323027835 0.056905535591 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.79 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.