-Do you support that the nuclear technology should be used constuctive purposes ?

Essay topics:

-Do you support that the nuclear technology should be used constuctive purposes ?

Nuclear sources is produced from Uranium. It has a huge energy potential and it is used about variety fields throughout history. Nuclear things are known as a bad things mostly by people but nuclear sources may be used for good things. However, the certain periods of history nuclear sources are used for bas purposes. USA produced nuclear bomb and they used it against Japan. The millions people died in this disaster. Nowadays, the nuclear sources are used political issues, military deterrence and countries for self defense whereas the countries may use the nuclear source for producing energy.
To start with, all countries in the world want self-defense for coming dengers from outside. This is natural right. Nowadays, the countries have to develop their military system according today’s evolving technology. For instnace, the countries such as China, USA and Rusia develop intercontinental balistic rockets. These rockets may be utilized for security of country and threat factor against other countries in today’s political conditions. Thus, the civils who live countries may feel in safe and peaceful.
In addition to being used the nuclear source for military defense, we may use the nuclear source for energy. Nuclear energy is used for necessity variety fields by countries. Nuclear sources has the huge powerbecause of this it is used in needed areas such as industry, security,health and researching. For instance, nuclear energy is used for producing electricity. And also, it is used for health fields such as X-ray, ultrasound and tomograpy. Thus, the nuclear energy is used not only for military issues but also most field in life.
From what has been discussed above, we may finally draw the conclusion that, nuclear energy may be used accordingneeds such as in military or in life. Hopefully, it will be for constructive purposes and it will benefit for eveybody because It should not be used for bad purposes.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nuclear sources is produced from Uranium...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 173, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'thing'?
Suggestion: thing
...tory. Nuclear things are known as a bad things mostly by people but nuclear sources ma...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 279, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , health
... needed areas such as industry, security,health and researching. For instance, nuclear ...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, may, so, thus, whereas, for instance, in addition, such as, to start with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1640.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27331189711 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77702579975 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485530546624 0.561755894193 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4197251148 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.0952380952 106.682146367 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8095238095 20.7667163134 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04761904762 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216340349749 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0814162028379 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0641913853011 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15512716626 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0809422125505 0.056905535591 142% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 50.2224549098 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 11.3001002004 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.69 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.