Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and more creativity than reading. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer.
These days more and more people are discussing their views about the role of extra-curricular activities for developing adequate skills and creation in child. The question is whether involving them in different fun activities are worth than focusing them in reading. The present essays examine this issue in detail and fully support the notion to support children in doing enjoyable activities.
To begin with, involving children in creative activities will lead them to develop social skills which normal reading procedure cannot attribute. By engaging child in those activities, will automatically develop a habit of being practical to cope up with practicalities thereby they will truly form adequate skills to work in team. As we have seen in our communities, that those people involved in reading activities are not so social and somehow lags confidence e while dealing with people. So, undoubtedly this effort will help them to acquire skills leading them to face different challenges related with team works.
However, many opine that reading skills flourished immense knowledge in child’s brain but in my view if someone does not enjoy regular activities they are lagging learning skills There are many people, for instance, who rote the whole book from day to night, yet does not grasp the content of the subject. The aforementioned example shows that there must be enjoyable activities that will push the small ones to explore on the content of curricula. So, it is irrefutable to say that different extra activities will have children to develop interest to learn the contents much more.
To recapitulate, although reading is general requirement to get knowledge, a child must be involved in different enjoyable activities so that they will develop social and learning skills from the childhood.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: WORTH_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worse', the comparative of 'bad'?
Suggestion: worse
...ng them in different fun activities are worth than focusing them in reading. The pres...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, while, for instance, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35191637631 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82017815046 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581881533101 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.4574829125 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.636363636 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0909090909 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213196772615 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0868726155419 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0291994783412 0.0667982634062 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137241085018 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317820265671 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.