Doing an enjoyable activity with a child can develop better skills and imagination than reading. To what extent do you agree? Use reasons and specific examples to explain your answer.
Over the past decades, the booming of computer games and sport participation’s have sparked heated debates due to the ensuing additive possibilities. Although some conventional educators perplex about the distraction on children’ studies, it remains evident to the fact that the participation’s of these enjoyable ones are deemed incredibly effective on skill acquisition and empowering imagination. The aim of this essay is to explore the benefits of these activities to the growth of our children.
To begin with, it is intuitively obvious that entertaining activities such as joining a console game with peers are widely perceived as an impetus of interpersonal skill development. In fact, countless digital games necessitate teamwork and communication to accomplish. For instance, recent empirical research from the Virtual Game Committee escertained that children who regularly participate in those leading strategy games excelled at task collaboration, shared resources allocation and group discussion, in comparison to their counterparts who thoroughly immerse in academic studies. Seen in this light, children enrolled in these contention could intensify their interpersonal skills through vigorous training.
Meanwhile, another pivotal components to remember is the sport activities most children are engrossed in. What this means is that, coupled with the physical enhancement, regular participation in these activities warrants a rapid employment of imagination entailing cognitive abilities and prediction. Evidently, having conducted an extensive studies with over 3000 children, scientists from the Sport Society established that juniors who constantly engage in football can perform thousands of predictions counting on the continuous changing circumstances on the field. Consequently, animated acitivities are not only an opportunity for children to unwind the strain given by schooling, but also flourish the power of imagination.
In conclusion, compared with traditional reading, enjoyable activities are likely to encourage the growth of practical skill and creativity. It is predicted that educational institutions will enact any measures to alleviate the detriment effects presented by game addiction.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 466, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'resources'' or 'resource's'?
Suggestion: resources'; resource's
... excelled at task collaboration, shared resources allocation and group discussion, in com...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 630, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this contention' or 'these contentions'?
Suggestion: this contention; these contentions
...een in this light, children enrolled in these contention could intensify their interpersonal ski...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'study'?
Suggestion: study
...vidently, having conducted an extensive studies with over 3000 children, scientists fro...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1935.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 6.1821086262 5.12529762239 121% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4486328038 2.80592935109 123% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661341853035 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 506.74238477 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.1863961167 49.4020404114 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 148.846153846 106.682146367 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0769230769 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122886246584 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0448370034913 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483395045095 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0768955515198 0.151304729494 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.028228370283 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.0946893788 150% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.74 50.2224549098 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.86 12.4159519038 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.74 8.58950901804 137% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.