Due to the fact that in order to produce in order to produce meat normally more area will be needed in comparison with a crop, some people aver that meat usage should be diminished in all corner of the world.
Due to the fact that in order to produce meat normally more area will be needed in comparison with a crop, some people aver that meat usage should be diminished in all corner of the world. Nevertheless, there are some tactics to reduce the meat consumption they can contribute to devastating problems which should not be neglected.
The first and foremost policy to deter the general public from eating meat could be raising their awareness in terms of the deleterious impact that consuming meat especially red meat may cause on their health. As a case in point, individuals may suffer from some types of cardiovascular diseases if they eat a plethora of meat. If people get informed regarding these hazards in advance, they appear to eat crop instead of meat. In addition to this, some types of meat which required less land to produce should be available for the citizens, irrespective of their financial condition and they can use them as a viable alternative such as ostrich.
Regarding the conceivable problems which may appear as a result of this policy malnutrition and unemployment for the people concerned appear to be the more important issues compared with other problems. Incontrovertibly, it is of paramount importance for ones, irrespective of their age and gender, to assimilate special vitamins which are contained in meat. In a case that health-planners promote the culture of do not consume meat, people could suffer from not receiving these vitamins which may lead to poor-diet. Furthermore, many occupations may be lost regarding the people working for producing meat.
To sum up, according to the aforementioned remarks, however generating meat needs more land and the land is getting rare in some countries, reducing worlds meat consumption may result in long term health and financial problems not only for the users but also for the producers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-13 | Mohammad Khaleghi Esfahani | 73 | view |
- The pie charts compare the percentage of British pupils at a specific university who are bilingual or polyglot in two different time spans. 61
- Due to the fact that in order to produce in order to produce meat normally more area will be needed in comparison with a crop, some people aver that meat usage should be diminished in all corner of the world. 73
- The illustration demonstrates the proportion of graduates unable to find an appropriate occupation in a specific European nation over the course of a two year. 78
- The bar chart compares the volume of male and female participating in different evening courses, namely drama, painting, sculpture, and language; while the pie chart shows the ages of these attendees. 89
- The bar chart compares the volume of smartphones and landlines per 100 people in seven nations. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 44, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
... first and foremost policy to deter the general public from eating meat could be raising their...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, in addition, such as, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1567.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12091503268 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94072799776 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532679738562 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.9585087003 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.454545455 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8181818182 20.7667163134 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0909090909 7.06120827912 157% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.447355186759 0.244688304435 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193476257268 0.084324248473 229% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.250586357449 0.0667982634062 375% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.315845044345 0.151304729494 209% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.26146827423 0.056905535591 459% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.