It is true to say that the usage of fast food could contribute to devastating health problems
It is true to say that the usage of fast food could contribute to devastating health problems. In this regard, it is claimed that better health education could mitigate this vexing issue. By my reckoning, if the general public informed about the drawbacks of eating junk food via the health education programs, this problem could be addressed to a great extent and I quite agree with this idea.
There are various methods in order to raise awareness of citizens in terms of the dangers of consuming easy to prepared food by health education. As a case in point, health planners and local authorities could inform the people via social media. Residents could be taught about the negative effects of their poor diet on their health. In such a context, they will be demotivated to purchase junk food and may select a healthier meal which guarantees their health.
There are other tactics regarding health education, which should be taken into account to encourage and persuade consumers to opt for alternative food resources instead of fast food. It is recommended that parents teach their offspring about the drawbacks of fast food and they avoid using it themselves. Children due to their childish characteristics will follow the behavior of their parents and might consume far less junk food in their adulthood. In addition to this, in order to boost health education, school curriculum should be devised to enhance the knowledge of pupils about the negative impacts of fast food on their body.
To sum up, it is crystal clear that health education could bring tangible benefits for individuals in terms of the drawbacks of eating junk food and convince them not to use this food.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...s vexing issue. By my reckoning, if the general public informed about the drawbacks of eating ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, regarding, so, in addition, it is true, to sum up, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97872340426 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58562924598 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542553191489 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 414.0 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9621348557 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378312244618 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.16515288605 0.084324248473 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.199873999419 0.0667982634062 299% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.228856991807 0.151304729494 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118183730286 0.056905535591 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.