The bar chart compares the volume of smartphones and landlines per 100 people in seven nations.
The bar chart compares the volume of smartphones and landlines per 100 people in seven nations.
Overall, while more people attracted to use landlines in Canada, the US, and Denmark in other counterparts utilizing cellphone take the lead.
Looking at the graph, it is crystal clear that people in Denmark and Italy employed far higher landlines and mobiles with around 85 and 90 respectively.
Regarding mobile use, the general public in Denmark, the Uk, Sweden, and Italy used more than the other three countries and their number ranged from 80 to 90. Canadian people, on the other hand, accounted for the lowest number with approximately 37. This followed by the US and Germany citizens with roughly 45 and 70 respectively.
Usage of landlines in most of the countries with the exception of Denmark and Italy hovered around 60 per 100. Italian people tend to use far fewer landlines constituting slightly above 40. This is in contrast with Denmark citizens who achieved the highest number in this regard reaching slightly below 90.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-29 | Mohammad Khaleghi Esfahani | 78 | view |
- The layouts provide an overview of the changes having happened by 2010 at West Park Secondary School ( WPSS). 84
- It is true to say that in the new millennium most of the nations struggling with environmental issues. 78
- The diagram demonstrates various stages undertaken in order to design a trade show over the course of two years. 56
- It is true to say that in some nations many people struggling with a wide range of diseases due to consuming excessive junk food. 73
- In the new millennium, many people select to travel by their own four-wheel vehicle or tram. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 27, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...espectively. Regarding mobile use, the general public in Denmark, the Uk, Sweden, and Italy u...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 45, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...e of landlines in most of the countries with the exception of Denmark and Italy hovered around 60 per...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, regarding, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 871.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09356725146 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6178720352 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608187134503 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7676945012 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.7777777778 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279084740772 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156258188864 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.302645954782 0.0843802449381 359% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.257002376891 0.15604864568 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.373677658993 0.0819641961636 456% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.