The best way to educate children is by using the internet in every lesson.
To what extent do you share this opinion? What other ways are there of making lessons effective for children?
In the new millennium, the internet has penetrated in almost every sphere of human life. In such a context it is claimed that the best method to educate pupils is utilizing the internet in all their school curriculums. Nevertheless, by my reckoning, it is not always a practical policy and there are some other beneficial tactics absorbing the attention of students to their assignments.
On the one hand, the advocates of employing the internet aver that due to the wide range of available data in every subject it is the best way to educate children via the internet. In addition to this, by using the attracting and related videos and pictures in the class students will be more inclined to pay attention to the teacher which could contribute to better academic performance.
On the other hand, there are other alternatives options available for the teacher to make lessons effective ranging from classwork activities to educational games. The opponents of using the internet claim that it may contain false information or even too professional data which can not be used for every lesson. Regarding this, the instructor could attract the attention of students by dividing them into separate groups to do their study and give a special prize to the ones who performed far better than others. Besides, a well-informed and experienced teacher knows how to present lessons that the adolescents absorbed in their speech. Therefore, it would be quite beneficial if widely acclaimed teachers share their ideas in terms of the best teaching methods.
To sum up, according to the aforementioned remarks it is true to say that the internet could bring tangible benefits for youngsters if used in some of their lessons. However, undoubtedly it cannot be employed in all their curriculum and other effective ways are severely needed.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, may, nevertheless, regarding, so, therefore, well, in addition, it is true, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10333333333 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86195543098 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566666666667 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.7478016891 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.583333333 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9166666667 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275107192638 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0923671563427 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0638856959862 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152654327037 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479211647314 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.