The layouts provide an overview of the changes having happened by 2010 at West Park Secondary School ( WPSS).
The layouts provide an overview of the changes having happened by 2010 at West Park Secondary School ( WPSS).
Overall, as can be seen, WPSS experienced significant changes in terms of expansion and relocation of some of its facilities. Also, accommodations and farmland had omitted until 1980.
Looking at the illustrations, it is crystal clear that only school and playground remained in their first locations, however, the latter diminished its size in 2010. Since 1950 to 1980, the farmland has altered to the sports field and the houses have changed to the car park and the science block. From 1980 onwards, the car park has expanded, almost three-fold and the sports field has halved. Also, the playground shrunk in 2010 compared with 1980. The science block, which is located adjacent to the school does not encounter any changes in the three-time spans. It is clear that facilities available at the west park secondary school increased significantly in 2010 in comparison with 1950.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-10 | Mohammad Khaleghi Esfahani | 84 | view |
- The bar chart compares the volume of smartphones and landlines per 100 people in seven nations. 78
- It is true to say that in the new millennium, the general public tends to follow specific similar lifestyle in terms of clothing, meals, and types of TV programs. 78
- The diagram below shows the cutting tools used by man 1.4 million years ago and 80000 years ago. 78
- The illustrations demonstrate the typical temperature and normal sunshine hours in London, New York, and Sydney. 89
- It is true to say that the usage of fast food could contribute to devastating health problems 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed by 2010 at West Park Secondary School WPSS. Overall, as can be seen, WPSS exp...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16149068323 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75896677927 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608695652174 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4232121603 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3333333333 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8888888889 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.468655736136 0.215688989381 217% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.195058859117 0.103423049105 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.293702561247 0.0843802449381 348% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.436491276988 0.15604864568 280% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.405478815054 0.0819641961636 495% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.