Employers should focus on personal qualities over qualifications and experience when choosing someone for a job. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In this competitive time, recruiting a suitable employee is the basic need of any living business. Whether personal qualities or qualifications and experience are more important is a debatable question/speculation/hypothesis. For a potential business to evolve, the ideal worker must have both personal and professional qualities.
On the one hand, if any business wants to lead the competitors, personal qualities of an employee are the fundamental requirement. In other words, as today’s world is more about creating innovation and building things that have never been built before, an explorer mindset of the worker is the recipe for success. To take for example Jeff Bezos, who started his own company in the mid-90s with an exceptional mindset and now his discovery “Amazon” is the world’s biggest online shopping/ sales company. Consequently, individual abilities have an imperative role to play in the success of any organization.
On the other hand, while hiring a worker, professional qualities are not a less important factor in any way. To put in simple words, candidates with advanced degrees demonstrate a number of great qualities, aside from the obvious subject matter expertise. These people show critical thinking skills, persistence and a strong drive to succeed. Another key thing to remember is that the relevant knowledge for the particular field is not less than a blessing for a company. For example, staff that has already worked in the sales department can provide immediate benefits in the same department of a different organization.
In conclusion, after analyzing the above-mentioned information it becomes clear that personal as well as professional qualities/attributes/skills should be considered before selecting an employee for the position/role.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 623, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...department of a different organization. In conclusion, after analyzing the above...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ting an employee for the position/role.
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, so, well, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1541.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 271.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68634686347 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.84133373034 2.80592935109 137% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619926199262 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3530279397 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.538461538 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8461538462 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.06120827912 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124782218681 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.044572463919 0.084324248473 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469765663848 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0845664847947 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0352383773994 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.