Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is undeniable that addressing environmental catastrophes is one of the most thorny issues. While some assert that it is the government but not citizens who will take on the responsibility to protect the environment, I would argue that environmental protection is the mutual responsibility of both the government and the public.
On the one hand, imposing strict penalties and raising people’s awareness of environmental protection should be done by the government. Indeed, levying strict fines toward those who violate the environmental protection law might accelerate the efficiency of environmental protection. Take Singapore as a prime example, the government has been imposing an array of policies against waste disposal in public, which, in turn, results in a free-rubbish country. Additionally, rasing people’s awareness of the importance of a free-pollutant environment appears to be quite effective. This is because once people fully acknowledge the benefits of breathing fresh air to their health, they might eventually recognize the needs of safeguarding the environment.
On the other hand, what citizens might take action is to steer clear of using plastic bags and private cars. First and foremost, avoiding plastic bags might solve soil pollution. In practice, wasted plastic containers tend to contain a plethora of toxic chemicals that usually deteriorate soil pollution. Thus, if plastic bags are eliminated in household wastes, it could result in deterring soil pollution. In tandem with this, a no private car policy is what the public could take priority to protect the environment. This is because carbon dioxide emissions from cars have been attributed to air pollution for years, and therefore a free-private cars transport system is likely to hinder the environment from being severely polluted.
In conclusion, it is plausible that retaining a pristine environment deems to be a daunting task for both the government and the public. Thus, it is imperative for both the government and individuals to join hands to minimize the grave consequences of environmental problems.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, thus, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54347826087 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24003548512 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 554.4 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4687116083 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4666666667 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.06666666667 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11937360767 0.244688304435 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.040470241954 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0478129035585 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.07995764544 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400011596427 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.