As the impacts of issues like global warming and water contamination become palpable, environmental protection has become one of humanity's chief objectives in the 21st century. However, people are still divided on whether this responsibility rests with state officials or the ordinary citizens. In this answer, I will look at the unique roles that both parties play in this endeavor before drawing a reasoned conclusion.
On the one hand, reversing the damage done to planet is a massive undertaking that seems impossible without government intervention. Most of the ongoing environmental problems are the direct result of energy production and consumption - something that can be regulated by legislation. In addition to this, the funds they have at their disposal and their ability to mobilize resources make governments indispensable in tackling environmental issues. For example, taxpayers' money can be ploughed back into researching ways to make green technologies more commonplace and affordable.
On the other hand, while the participation of governments in alleviating environment problems is wholly warranted, it would be imprudent to underestimate the contribution of ordinary citizens. People can make a huge difference with simple changes in lifestyle like taking public transport or classifying trash. Another way in which individuals can help protect the environment is through their consumption. Patronizing stores that champion sustainable business practices and boycotting companies that are reluctant to reduce waste are practical steps that consumers can take to push for a greener future. By the same token, the electorate can use their votes to make an impact by electing officials that care deeply about the deterioration of the planet and are committed to changing the status quo.
In conclusion, environmental conservation is a colossal responsibility that must be borne by both the state and the people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 269, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...esponsibility rests with state officials or the ordinary citizens. In this answer...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, still, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, by the same token, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1646.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.65635738832 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25424647155 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632302405498 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6193756629 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.615384615 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.15384615385 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113399404901 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0397478396805 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409391417694 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0658373980285 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0149147388232 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.0946893788 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.94 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.