The table below gives information on visitor statistics for 1996,1998 and 2000 for 1996,1998 and 2000 for various World Heritage sites in Australia
The table compares the number of people who paid visits to six World Heritage sites in Australia from 1996 to 2000.
It is clear that the period witnessed the increase in the quantity of travelers visiting those places, except central eastern rainforest reserve and macquarie Island. great barrier reef was the most attractive tourist destination over the period shown.
In 1996, great barrier reef appealed to 1,670,000 tourists, doubling the figure for rainforest reserve located in the central eastern which attracted only 810,000 people. over the four-year period, visitor statistics for great barrier reef increased moderately to nearly 3,000,000 in 1998 before another 200,000 climb from that time to 2000. In contrast, there was a minimal fall in the figure for rainforest reserve to 790,000 and 770,000 respectively.
Many fewer travelers visited the other destinations in comparison with the two first ones. Roughly 500,000 people went to Blue Mountains and Tasmania Wilderness each, which
went up to 581,000 and 483,000 in 2000. In comparison, 84,000 travelers selected Shark Bay in 1996, exponentially higher than macquarie Island’s with only 350 visitors. While the
former showed a rise to 89,000, the latter dropped marginally to only 330 in the end of the period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 117, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e sites in Australia from 1996 to 2000. It is clear that the period witnessed th...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 168, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Great
...ainforest reserve and macquarie Island. great barrier reef was the most attractive to...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rist destination over the period shown. In 1996, great barrier reef appealed to ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Over
...rn which attracted only 810,000 people. over the four-year period, visitor statistic...
^^^^
Line 5, column 455, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ve to 790,000 and 770,000 respectively. Many fewer travelers visited the other d...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1097.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45771144279 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66799365513 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63184079602 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.1688581156 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.7 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181388884069 0.215688989381 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070875351021 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856404742142 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0854507978994 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102639609821 0.0819641961636 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.