Education has proved it to be the driving force behind every breakthroughs of mankind during the course of time. Therefore, the question of whether or not should educational institutions curate students based upon their academic performance or it is better off to let them study without classification has divided the mass. The following paragraphs will take a bird's eye view upon the pros and cons of both sides.
On the one hand, the evident benefit of segregating learners with regard on their abilities is the ease of curriculum planning for the board of schools. The curriculum can be simplified and more objectively designed to target on specific disciplines that help to support the school-goers in honing their skills effectively. On top of that, the environment with peers that bear the same traits and talents also build of more competitive atmosphere, which fosters students to apply themselves wholeheartedly in order to set them apart from the groups. In Vietnam, for examples, this approach is widely applied in high schools for the gifted that provide a lot of outstanding candidates for the national teams to compete in regional and international academic contests.
One the other hand, the perk of having a open-for-all playground where children from all walks of life are put into one class should not be undermined. It is not an overstate that this environment bring a stress-free atmosphere to the students, which is fundamental attribute that education should strive for. Moreover, students have the chance to familiarized themselves in a scaled version of real world where they can learn to live in harmony with friends for different backgrounds and colors. This, in turn, helps the children to enhance their communicative and collaborative skills, which are crucial in the long run to become a well-developed and responsible citizen.
In conclusion, although the idea of sifted schools where students are chosen based on their performance in studying may sounds more efficient, I believe that schools are supposed to be the place where children should enjoy their study hours with the friends without any stress toward academic judgement.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: DURING_THE_COURSE_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'during'.
Suggestion: during
...e behind every breakthroughs of mankind during the course of time. Therefore, the question of whethe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...d during the course of time. Therefore, the question of whether or not should educational institutions ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'institutions'' or 'institution's'?
Suggestion: institutions'; institution's
...on of whether or not should educational institutions curate students based upon their academ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 40, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... One the other hand, the perk of having a open-for-all playground where children ...
^
Line 3, column 162, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ass should not be undermined. It is not an overstate that this environment bring a stress-fr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, well, apart from, for example, in conclusion, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25722543353 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98991058471 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583815028902 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 553.5 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.655472435 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.583333333 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8333333333 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185603940731 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595680212456 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.04616689436 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112634001866 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289353070387 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.82 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.