The implementation of compulsory military service by various nations as a defense strategy and patriotism promoter presents itself as an attractive concept. However, I vehemently disagree with the idea of extending this obligation to both men and women.
Firstly, military service imposes rigorous physical and mental demands. Individuals with physical disabilities or medical conditions cannot always meet these demands, putting their safety at risk. Furthermore, combat situations can lead to long-term emotional distress and trauma for soldiers. The American Psychological Association reports that soldiers who have experienced combat are more likely to suffer from PTSD and depression compared to non-combat veterans.
Moreover, compulsory military service disregards personal freedom and autonomy. This infringement of individual rights and liberties denies individuals the opportunity to voluntarily serve their country based on personal beliefs and convictions. Such voluntary service carries a deeper sense of commitment and dedication.
Additionally, the idea of compulsory military service for women raises gender equality concerns. Women may face discrimination and unequal treatment within the military. For instance, the Israeli Defense Forces have been criticized for assigning women to non-combat roles, despite their capabilities. The compulsory military service for women may also perpetuate societal attitudes that view women as inferior to men.
In conclusion, while compulsory military service seems like a practical solution for national defense, it comes with numerous challenges and negative consequences. Instead, promoting voluntary service allows individuals to choose to serve their country based on personal beliefs and convictions. This results in a dedicated and effective military, and a patriotic and inclusive society.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, may, moreover, so, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 13.1623246493 15% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1608.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.28125 5.12529762239 123% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06807528224 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.64453125 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.60771543086 124% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1705282371 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.5 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0625 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294928024627 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945826138494 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0750142574421 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15983788559 0.151304729494 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725072255076 0.056905535591 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 21.4 50.2224549098 43% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.3 11.3001002004 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.85 12.4159519038 152% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.09 8.58950901804 129% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.