With the palpable impacts of global warming and an influx of natural disasters in recent years, environmental protection has become one of the most heated topic of interest in the 21st century. Some assert that governments should collaborate in an urgent manner to come up with initiatives to mitigate the amount of non-renewable energy, such as gas and oil. I, undoubtedly, an active advocate on the idea of minimizing the consumption of fossil fuels.
On the one hand, a substantial number of developing countries is still strictly dependent on fossil fuels for the sake of economic growth and prosperity. This trend is justifiable as best due to the undeniable low price and its availability in the nature. Therefore, the country leaders would need to take upfront benefits precedent over long-term sustainability. Moreover, due to the disproportion of natural gas across countries that make the fortunate one like Saudi Arabia seems to be unpragmatic just to turn away from such a lucrative resources.
On the other hand, raw fuels like natural gas and seabed oil are nonrenewable energy, which always pose a threat of running out and a task of searching for alternatives toward the resource collectors. Millions year of dissolving and concentration of trillions animal corpses would only take a few hundred years to be exploited and used to the last drop. This alone proves how unsustainable a country could be if they heavily depend on this ancient energy.
In addition to the aforementioned reason, the inextricable relationship between human race and the environment also play a crucial role on fostering countries to look for a long-term resolution. An oil leak can take a tremendous toll on the eco-balance of an area spread across thousands of hectares of sea surface and kill uncountable amount of marine lives, disrupting the food chains that eventually, has adverse effects on the human race.
In conclusion, while it seems, at the time, irrational to ignore such an fruitful and easy-to-harvest energy, I'm convinced that is of paramount importance for the global communities to come up with an agreement on alleviating the woefully reckless consumption of fossil fuels.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 241, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an urgent manner" with adverb for "urgent"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ert that governments should collaborate in an urgent manner to come up with initiatives to mitigate...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 18, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...tion of fossil fuels. On the one hand, an substantial number of developing countr...
^^
Line 2, column 181, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'as the best'.
Suggestion: as the best
...d prosperity. This trend is justifiable as best due to the undeniable low price and its...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 525, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'resource'?
Suggestion: resource
...atic to turn away from such a lucrative resources. On the other hand, raw fuels like nat...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 71, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... at the time, irrational to ignore such an fruitful and easy-to-harvest energy, Im...
^^
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...an fruitful and easy-to-harvest energy, Im convinced that is of paramount importan...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1822.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22063037249 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12736244968 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601719197708 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.9665686564 49.4020404114 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.153846154 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8461538462 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92307692308 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130675908429 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0442273224182 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334738808318 0.0667982634062 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0692919308091 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239360050622 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 78.4519038076 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.