The practice of compulsory military service has been adopted by several nations as a means of safeguarding their security and fostering national pride. While this approach might seem alluring, I strongly contest the notion of expanding this requirement to include both men and women.
Firstly, military service is physically and mentally demanding, which can prove to be a challenge for some individuals. For example, individuals with physical disabilities or medical conditions may not be able to meet the requirements of military service, putting themselves in danger. Additionally, the psychological toll of military service, particularly in combat situations, can be severe and result in long-term emotional distress and trauma, as indicated by studies conducted by the American Psychological Association.
Furthermore, compulsory military service undermines individual freedom and autonomy. This imposed obligation restricts individuals from freely choosing to serve their country based on their personal beliefs and convictions. This type of voluntary service can often result in soldiers who are more committed and dedicated to their duties.
Moreover, extending compulsory military service to women raises significant gender equality issues. Women in the military can face discrimination and unequal treatment, such as being assigned to non-combat roles despite their capabilities. For instance, the Israeli Defense Forces have been criticized for such practices. The implementation of compulsory military service for women may also perpetuate societal attitudes that view women as inferior to men.
In conclusion, while compulsory military service might appear to be a practical solution for national defense, it is crucial to consider the numerous challenges and negative consequences that come with this approach. Rather than forcing individuals to serve, promoting voluntary service and encouraging individuals to choose to serve their country based on personal beliefs and convictions can result in a more dedicated and effective military and a more patriotic and inclusive society. This approach can also provide individuals with the freedom to make choices that align with their personal values and beliefs.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1914.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.96261682243 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0983653777 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566978193146 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 622.8 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.9722778651 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.6 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.6 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287136028287 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106173755392 0.084324248473 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508449079221 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166205473288 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451753006256 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 13.0946893788 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.63 8.58950901804 124% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.