Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Government plays an essential role in environmental preservation. However, to deal with the serious environmental problems, we should consider the role of politicians and residents.
First and foremost, we have already known that climate change, global warming, or pandemic are posed a significant threat to human life. To tackle each of those problems required efforts and cooperation of politicians and environmental organizations. Government pours much money, time to enhance the habitat for their resident and prevent imminent threats. For example, annually, the US government puts 5% of GDP to improve the healthcare and water sanitation systems- these methods help to deal with water pollution and epidemic prevention. Moreover, these issues relate to the environment are not only the story of one country but also the global story. The need for systematic environmental protection has increased, which means we need the cooperation of every country. The government will be in charge of diplomatic policy to create a strong relationship with other countries to make environmental preservations work effectively.
However, we must consider the role of inhabitants in environmental conservation. It is difficult for the authority to build up the water sanitation system without the help of residents. We could not imagine how hard pandemic prevention could be if each of the citizens is not taken action. Individuals are as crucial as the government in tackling environmental problems. They can variously take environmental protection action without taking them a lot of time or money. For example, to reduce the carbon dioxide level, they need to cut downtime using a motorbike. To mitigate water pollution, they should not allow themselves to dump the garbage on the ground. Small steps will create long-term beneficial effects.
To sum up, we have known the environment is not an easy problem to tackle. In order to make environmental protection work well, we need to have a combination of government and individuals.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, so, well, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 8.3376753507 276% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1718.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47133757962 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21092398873 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563694267516 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.297326249 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.4210526316 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5263157895 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.84210526316 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0996626858124 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0343321216293 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0442806423253 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0653587557418 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168619870194 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.15 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.