Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree

People have discrepant views with regard to the question of who should be responsible for protecting the environment. In my opinion, co-operations of politicians and every citizen will effectively tackle environmental problems.

An argument that politicians should take the responsibility of dealing with environmental issues is reasonable to some extent. This could be explained by the fact that the endeavors of politicians are required to potently address some rigorous problems such as global warming, climate shift, long term droughts or other extreme weather events. This is because solutions for such problems demand special equipment, the implications of modern technological devices and a large number of well-experienced scientists to collaborate. For instance, it takes years for researchers to collect various samples and analyze huge amounts of data in order to know the major causes of global warming, and to help them come up with the most efficient approaches to address this problem. Therefore, only governments can have sufficient funds and resources to invest in this.

However, I contend that every individual in society should also join hands to protect their habitats from environmental matters.First and foremost, people should raise their awareness of keeping their surrounding settings clean with no litter such as plastic bags or disposable items that have adverse impacts on the environment. For example, they can participate in local voluntary organizations to give a hand to making their hometowns a greener place to accommodate for a long-term period. There are various volunteer activities such as collecting rubbish on the beaches or riversides, planting more trees and flowers in the public parks, and encouraging the surrounding community to care more about the environment. As a result, more and more people are consciously aware of the paramount importance of environmental preservation, the earth will be protected from devastating consequences of environmental issues in the long run.

In conclusion, while politicians' actions will make considerable changes to alleviate the rate of problems related to the environment, the increasing environmental conscience of residents will also make significant contributions to the preservation of the environment.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 182, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...explained by the fact that the endeavors of politicians are required to potently ...
^^
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ons of modern technological devices and a large number of well-experienced scientists to collabor...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: First
...eir habitats from environmental matters.First and foremost, people should raise their...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion, with regard to

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1968.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77126099707 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32846770957 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595307917889 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.5998483396 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.0 106.682146367 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4166666667 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6666666667 7.06120827912 179% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147471908741 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.056039824618 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427014931315 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0927774853479 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210778358721 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.0 13.0946893788 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 12.4159519038 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.44 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.