Many argue that the opportunity to attend tertiary education is equal for every individual and that the government should provide free education for all students irrespective of their financial capacity. While this suggestion might be beneficial for students coming from low-income families and society as a whole, I maintain that it will put a heavier burden on the national budget and negatively affect students' attitudes toward studying.
On the one hand, the idea of supplying free higher education is reasonable to some extent. First and foremost, an exemption to tuition fees means that people from lower socioeconomic backgrounds can have a chance to pursue university. As the price of taking a course at university is relatively costly nowadays, many impoverished students can not afford these costs and they have to drop out of school to begin their working life. Therefore, with financial support from the government, these students can continue their studies and secure many well-paid jobs after graduating from university. Moreover, at the state level, society will benefit from a higher level of civilized citizens.
On the other hand, there are several reasons why the provision of free university fees will adversely influence the state budget and students’ learning attitude. The first reason is that in order to supply education without charge for every individual,it requires a huge amount of money. As a result, it will put a strain on the national fund, and a variety of essential aspects that need government investment will be delayed. The second reason involves the degradation in students’ determination towards their studying. This is because it costs students nothing to retake a failed subject at university, they will take it for granted and do not pay attention to academic outcomes.
In conclusion, although the exemption of university learning costs regardless of students’ financial conditions will do wonders for disadvantaged students as well as facilitate a more civilized community, I contend that the problems resulting from this phenomenon should also not be ignored. In my view, it is a better option for the government to have a policy to financially support university students according to their financial circumstances.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...tion without charge for every individual,it requires a huge amount of money. As a r...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1928.0 1615.20841683 119% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44632768362 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99577836109 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539548022599 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.8528644165 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.714285714 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2857142857 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.42857142857 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237273844973 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0845126390757 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610590118061 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153941761528 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368148006278 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.