Wasting foods has been a serious problem for many countries for a long time. Daily, across the globe, a large amount of food, millions of tonnes, is being wasted by human beings considering various actions. This essay discusses reasons accounted for this occurrence and provides possible remedies to counter it.
Discussing different reasons, the foremost one is an overproduction of the food than the required quantity. There are various places which required to make food in huge quantities such as restaurants, marriage functions, celebrations, and some events. These types of places and activities are abundant on a daily basis which is proven to be a significant contributor with regards to excessive food production. Another possible reason is the individual's choices. Most of the people have a distinct taste and a preference. Therefore, many times they avoid to eat food served to them and this ultimately contributes to food wastage.
Nevertheless, some meaningful measures could be taken to curb this problem. Food wastage could be controlled at its inception point and adopting an alternative approach that can utilize the food being wasted to feed needy people. To thwart increased waste, every people should have the onus to minimize food wastage and should cook the necessary amount with meticulous calculation. Additionally, people can be educated through various programs, campaignings, and daily advertising. Alternatively, the government can form some organizations or charitable trusts, who collect huge food being wasted and further distribute to poor and hungry people. India, for instance, has constituted one body that functions with this noble idea and also urging people to support through advertising. This solution is proving to be most effective in the true sense.
In conclusion, there are multiple reasons after larger food wastage daily around the world; however, by a conscientious approach with the moral responsibility of individuals through proper education and taking necessary steps, these could be solved effectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 549, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoid eating'.
Suggestion: avoid eating
... preference. Therefore, many times they avoid to eat food served to them and this ultimately...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ltimately contributes to food wastage. Nevertheless, some meaningful measures c...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57643312102 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0053251047 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601910828025 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1838143719 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4705882353 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23529411765 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197303654939 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0632017347843 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038236590802 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119521351155 0.151304729494 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453536605489 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.