Nowadays due to technological improvement people are come to know about different kind of tourist destination. At the same time, more and more traveler are visiting the places where situation are really challenging like Sahara desert and Antarctic. However, along with the innumerable benefit, there are some drawbacks too. Both, the pros and cons are discuss in the ensuing paragraph.
There are several advantages to the travelers, foremost one is that it make individual mentally strong. By this, I mean that on extreme kind of traveling mostly traveler is traveling at their own and there is on one to support, so(therefore) they become self-dependent which make them mentally strong. Moreover, they travel all across the globe and have a chance to explore various kind of geography. As, each and every nation have their own kind of geography and different kind of challenges. Most importantly, traveler learn how to survive in various kind of environment.
However, despite of these advantage, demerits cannot be over looked. The most concerning one is that some time traveler are unable to interact with the other human due to linguistic barrier. Because, there are different language in different country so some time if they don’t know the native language of that particular country it become difficult to convey with other individual. Additionally, this type of tour are costly as well as time consuming. For example, if someone planning to climb The Mount Everest then they required equipment and other gear of climbing which are costly and climbing Everest is also time consuming. To cap it all, such kind of adventure trip are more dangerous compare to other trip.
In conclusion, it can be understood that visiting place where condition are challenging offer number of benefits such as mental health and exploration. But cost and conversation are concerning issues.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 139, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'traveler' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: traveler
...destination. At the same time, more and more traveler are visiting the places where situation...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 353, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'discussed'.
Suggestion: discussed
...wbacks too. Both, the pros and cons are discuss in the ensuing paragraph. There are s...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: OVER_LOOKED[1]
Message: Did you mean 'overlooked'?
Suggestion: overlooked
... of these advantage, demerits cannot be over looked. The most concerning one is that some t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'becomes'?
Suggestion: becomes
... language of that particular country it become difficult to convey with other individu...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 482, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'plans'.
Suggestion: plans
...time consuming. For example, if someone planning to climb The Mount Everest then they re...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... more dangerous compare to other trip. In conclusion, it can be understood that...
^^^
Line 4, column 181, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... exploration. But cost and conversation are concerning issues.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, really, so, then, therefore, well, for example, i mean, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1586.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25165562914 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82733567606 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566225165563 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.1182989446 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2941176471 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7647058824 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.17647058824 7.06120827912 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16259280401 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0465425196733 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.090010316962 0.0667982634062 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128956893324 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10541711496 0.056905535591 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.