Every year several languages die out. Some people think that it is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Numerous languages vanish yearly. A commonly held view is that this situation will make life more convenient as there are fewer languages. Although I have some sympathy for this idea, it is also true that the extinction of many languages can affect negatively.
On the one hand, it is hard to deny that language plays an essential role in making interactions. If there are fewer languages, it will trigger trade to rise between nations in the world. Australia and Singapore, for instance, speak similar languages so both countries easily understand each other. Consequently, there is an increasing trace between these two nations compared to other neighbors. In addition, the mother tongue can reflect itself in the tourism sector. If people travel without facing language barriers, they will get to know other cultures more clearly. One explanation for this, according to visitors' comments, they choose countries that are multilingual as they are likely to hesitate regarding language obstacles.
On the other hand, it is true that the disappearance of numerous native languages can affect to vanish of history. In other words, losing a language means losing a culture. Some nations have historical documents written in their own languages. If they are not translated into another language, they may face the danger of being lost. For example, a large number of previous generations forgot their mother tongue, and therefore, they also lost their history by mixing with other nations. Secondly, children may not keep up with their studies because it is hard for them to adapt to a new language. As a result, the illiteracy rate can grow in certain countries.
In conclusion, despite holding the view that the disappearance of several languages can make life easier, I also believe it will badly affect some nations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 347, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... the danger of being lost. For example, a large number of previous generations forgot their mothe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in other words, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19727891156 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74636221893 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574829931973 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4689832458 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.8888888889 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3333333333 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212263128865 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654122963884 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485581845295 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148799141062 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0422572992931 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.