National should spend more money on skills and vocational training for particular work, rather than on university education. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that governments should allocate money to skills and vocational education rather than to universities. Despite agreeing that vocational training has good points, I believe that university education should not be underestimated.
On the one hand, there are two main reasons why people consider vocational education a preferred option. First of all, schools in the vocational sector often cost less than other types of learning institutions, particularly fees and tuition that are not as high as some distinct schools. If students pay less each year during the course, for example, they can mitigate any dept and save money that allows them to start building their budget and also establishing capital after graduation. Second, vocational courses help students focus on particular skills which are appropriate for their future jobs. Those who engage in this kind of education are likely to spend significant time practicing skills that will be needed and applied to the workplace, instead of learning too many theoretical lessons. Consequently, they can have experience in their fields and easily find jobs after finishing the training program.
On the other hand, I am firmly convinced that university education has numerous assets. Initially, college graduates seem to have greater career opportunities. In the long-term purpose, a degree can be vital for students to find quality jobs with a higher income. To be more specific, according to a government report focused on market analytics, the total of candidate posts requiring a bachelor’s degree reached nearly 98,5 million from 2019 to 2022. Furthermore, students who choose a university education can gain various skills which are essential in the workplace. For instance, some college programs have a heavy emphasis on critical thinking so students can evolve their ability to think on a deeper level about various topics that help them effectively solve problems when they experience the actual working process.
In conclusion, although vocational training can have inevitable benefits, I firmly believe that university education should not be overlooked.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, furthermore, if, look, second, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1805.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51987767584 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89877609704 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608562691131 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.8417049824 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.333333333 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.275851849606 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944280244059 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825711263525 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.199722593419 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102645309447 0.056905535591 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.