Some people think that people are responsible for their happiness. Others feel that happiness depends on other factors in their life. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is often assumed that pleasure is based on an individual’s responsibilities. Whilst others think happiness is dependent upon a number of external contributors. This essay will discuss both perspectives and explain the reasons why I support the former view.
On the one hand, there are extrinsic factors that contribute to happiness. Initially, material adequacy is the main factor influencing people’s happiness. Money, houses, and cars, for example, can be all things that people concern about in daily life. It seems that once their needs are met, joy and satisfaction will also increase. Furthermore, the quality of social connections can impact a person’s mind either. The stronger bonds people have with friends and family, the less likely they feel unpleasant emotions because they are safe in the acknowledgment that there are people who care about them.
In contrast, opponents regard people can control their pleasure despite their circumstances. This can be achieved through the practice of mindfulness which involves acknowledging present situations without judgment. By embracing this approach, individuals can alleviate expectations and regrets, leading to an immediate and enduring state of tranquility. For instance, numerous people in the world engage in yoga classes or mindfulness and healing practices. As a result, practitioners can let go of the past and become passionate advocates, particularly those facing mental and physical suffering. Their transformative journeys are living proof that people can be responsible for their own happiness.
In conclusion, I believe both arguments have their own merits. However, I think that individuals can cultivate their own joys by embracing mindfulness.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70542635659 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17080797207 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658914728682 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9981544992 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5882352941 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1764705882 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35294117647 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313191903418 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856383532948 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746468366562 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165435983613 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202652988719 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.25 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, in fact, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 41.998997996 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1472.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.70542635659 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17080797207 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658914728682 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.9981544992 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.5882352941 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1764705882 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.35294117647 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313191903418 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0856383532948 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746468366562 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165435983613 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0202652988719 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.25 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.