Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their functions. Do u agree or disagree?
Some people hold the view that with technological development, computers can take the place of public libraries. While I agree that online sources bring various merits for people, I believe that it is still worth spending money on maintaining reading rooms.
On the one hand, there are two main advantages of online information. Initially, online sources can store a huge amount of information which is more convenient than any physical libraries. This also allows researchers to easily get the information they need without taking time to come to local libraries. In addition, people can look for data on the internet whenever they want. This is therefore especially beneficial to those who have a hectic schedule and can not visit public libraries during the operating time.
On the other hand, the preservation of reading rooms is necessary because of their distinguishing features that can not be substituted by computers. Libraries, in numerous countries, are still one of the most means of accessing information, particularly for senior citizens. In fact, most elderly people these days are technophobes so local libraries are their preferred option. Furthermore, public libraries are considered a more reliable source of information compared with online sources. Indeed, there is an abundance of inaccurate and unreliable information on the internet, while the information from libraries is more reliable and carefully categorized by library staff members.
In conclusion, although computer technology has its own benefits in providing information, I believe that preserving public libraries is necessary.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, look, so, still, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1373.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 245.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60408163265 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08386187785 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620408163265 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4687785538 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.615384615 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8461538462 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213923685438 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704604900171 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053995608785 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141265128295 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458353042925 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, look, so, still, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1373.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 245.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60408163265 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08386187785 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.620408163265 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4687785538 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.615384615 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8461538462 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.30769230769 7.06120827912 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213923685438 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704604900171 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.053995608785 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141265128295 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458353042925 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.