Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Globalization has led both negative and positive effect in cultures, languages and business in all over the world. One of these consequences is that a great number of lesser spoken languages are fading because they are no longer used in the context of the modern world. In my opinion, I totally disagree with this point of view.
On the one hand, from business perspective, moving towards a single international language will make easier without a language barrier which help develop international trade and widen diplomatic relationships. English now has become the world’s leading language is indisputable. The potential for misunderstanding and misinterpretation has decline considerably. This extends come to the public general, for example holidays and wider social communication, make all more possible by using a singular language, it promotes development of international tourism.
On the other hand, cultures and traditions born together with languages. Losing one’s national tongue means losing one’s identity. To be more specific, if people use another language to explain and educate for the next generation about their culture and tradition, their decedents will not understand and absorb all the values and importance their culture and tradition. If one’s culture or tradition is fading or losing, it could cause resentment in that country. This could actually leads to diplomatic issues which are precisely what globalization is seeking to minimize.
In conclusion, while I am entirely in favour of singular language push to develop global economy and closer relations among countries in the world. I strongly believe that it is extremely critical that traditional and cultural values need to be reserved. I reaffirm idea that life wold be better if fewer-used languages in the world still in use.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 501, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...nt in that country. This could actually leads to diplomatic issues which are precisel...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 286, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...reserved. I reaffirm idea that life wold be better if fewer-used languages in the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, if, so, still, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1563.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56227758007 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14093986302 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619217081851 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1337438408 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.2 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7333333333 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13333333333 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224788313891 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704380003002 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476093571517 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136383390716 0.151304729494 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286705756442 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.