The tables below give information abou sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two tables provided reveal the sales situation of Fair trade included coffee and bananas among 5 European countries in 1999 and 2004.
It is evident that the sales of bananas are far more exceeded than that of coffee, especially Switzerland people who consumed the most bananas than the other countries while UK preferred to consume more coffee than the other. Moreover, the sales of those two commodities saw a growth in over 5 years, except Sweden and Denmark, whose sales on bananas had a downward trend.
As of coffee sales, UK had a sharp rise with 20 million euros, which was about 13 times in 2004 compared to 1999. Similarly, Switzerland also doubled its coffee sales from 3 to 6 millions euros from 1999 to 2004. Denmark, Belgium and Sweden saw a less significant upward trend.
As of bananas sales, Switzerland got the highest rank in the given table, accounted for 15 millions euros in 1999 and in 2004, its consumed quantities were tripled. By contrast, the other countries’ sales figures on bananas were not much noticeable, less than 6 million euros altogether in 1999 and not even exceeding 12 millions euros after 200. More interestingly, while the three other countries had an increase in sales figures of bananas, Sweden and Denmark saw a plunge by 80% and 50% respectively.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1092.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94117647059 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68033002414 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 106.607317073 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561085972851 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2401002062 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.333333333 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5555555556 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158923063178 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757291709976 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550772894749 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121205054724 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0502255667819 0.0819641961636 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.