The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts provides reveal the proportion of Italian and Yemeni citizens in three age groups in 2000 and projection for 2050.
It is evident that Yemen had the younger population than Italia in the year 2000 and the prediction for the year 2050 is the same trend. The population of both countries are predicted to become older over the 50 year period.
In 2000, just over half of the Yemeni population were under 14, compared to just over 14% of Italians in the same age group. People over 60 took account for only a very small percentage at 3.6% in Yemen, in contrast to approximate sixth time lower than the Italian citizens, which were nearly a quarter. The largest group for Italy was 15 to 59 years old with just over 60% while Yemen had 46,3 % of its population.
Yemen’s average age forecasts to rise with the percentage of over 60 and the middle age group increases by just over 2% and 11% respectively, leaving the youngest group declines by nearly 13%. It is clear that by 2050, the number of people in Italy over 60 will jump to 42.3%, grow by more than 18%. The proportion of those in the youngest and the middle category will drop to 11.5% and 46.2 % in turn.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 380, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to 59 years old with just over 60% while Yemen had 46,3 % of its population. Y...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
while, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.53953488372 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38783505477 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553488372093 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9916474853 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.444444444 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8888888889 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159984823125 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751269519565 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546380140435 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117664237407 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0458770727203 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.