The provided tables illustrate the amount of sale of coffee and banana fairtrade-labelled in 1999 and 2004 in five European nations. It is clear that the sale of coffee and banana of fairtrade-labelled increased in all five countries while the amount of banana sale decreased in Sweden and Denmark from in the same years.
In 2004, the UK was associated with the largest sale of fairtrade-labelled coffee and experienced significant growth, reaching 20 million euros compared with the amount of coffee sale in 1999 which was 1.5 million euros. Also, Switzerland had a doubled growth in the coffee sale, reaching 3 to 6 million euros from 1999 to 2004. Denmark, Belgium and Sweden a slight moved up in the coffee selling when it came to comparing with 1999.
The second table depicts the amount of bananas sale of fairtrade-labelled and it is obvious the extreme growth of banana sale in Switzerland around threefold compared with 15 million euros in 1999, reaching 47 million euros in 2004. There was a considerable increase in banana sale in the UK, obtaining from 1 to 5.5 from 1999 to 2004. Belgium, also, enjoyed an upward trend of the sale in 2004, hitting 4 million euros. Sweden and Denmark achieved sales of 1 and 0.9 respectively in 2004, as against 1.8 and 2 million euros respectively in 1999 which was downward.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...bled growth in the coffee sale, reaching 3 to 6 million euros from 1999 to 2004. ...
^^
Line 5, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...os in 1999, reaching 47 million euros in 2004. There was a considerable increase ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1106.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89380530973 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03000113595 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.455752212389 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.6364308183 43.030603864 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.888888889 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1111111111 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261687386272 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146542664644 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0873269589232 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.221909959068 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687819484037 0.0819641961636 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.